Integrating Windows CE development kit into Visual C++ 4.2
Jon Turner -- jturner@agris.com Tuesday, December 03, 1996 Environment: VC++ 4.2-flat, Win 95, NT 4.0, Windows CE Windows CE is a 'lite' version of Windows '95 for smaller, hand-held = computers. The development kit is beta. It is supposed to integrate = into the Visual C++ development environment, but after my colleague = installs the SDK the Visual C++ environment will crash on startup every = time. I appologize for not know the details of the crash, but my = colleague didn't remember and is now in the process of totally removing = Visual C++ and reinstalling. Has anyone out there had any experience with Windows CE and SDK? Jon Turner Agris Corporation jturner@agris.com
Robert H. Mowery III -- rmowery@csci.csc.com Thursday, December 05, 1996 [Mini-digest: 7 responses] You need to drop back to VC++ 4.0. According to the information at the microsoft web site for the CE and my own personal trial, the SDK will only work under VC++4.0. Additionally MFC is not supported at this time :-( So you need to use the SDK and therefore any app written in MFC will not yet work. Let's hope the MFC team puts out something even beta in for this so we can use MFC. -Robert Mowery ---------- From: Jon TurnerTo: 'mfc-l@netcom.com' Subject: Integrating Windows CE development kit into Visual C++ 4.2 Date: Tuesday, December 03, 1996 9:49 AM Environment: VC++ 4.2-flat, Win 95, NT 4.0, Windows CE Windows CE is a 'lite' version of Windows '95 for smaller, hand-held computers. The development kit is beta. It is supposed to integrate into the Visual C++ development environment, but after my colleague installs the SDK the Visual C++ environment will crash on startup every time. I appologize for not know the details of the crash, but my colleague didn't remember and is now in the process of totally removing Visual C++ and reinstalling. Has anyone out there had any experience with Windows CE and SDK? Jon Turner Agris Corporation jturner@agris.com ---------- -----From: "Tomasz Pawlowski" Current version of Windows CE SDK works only with VC++4.0. ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: Integrating Windows CE development kit into Visual C++ 4.2 Author: mfc-l@netcom.com at internet Date: 12/5/96 9:56 AM Environment: VC++ 4.2-flat, Win 95, NT 4.0, Windows CE Windows CE is a 'lite' version of Windows '95 for smaller, hand-held = computers. The development kit is beta. It is supposed to integrate = into the Visual C++ development environment, but after my colleague = installs the SDK the Visual C++ environment will crash on startup every = time. I appologize for not know the details of the crash, but my = colleague didn't remember and is now in the process of totally removing = Visual C++ and reinstalling. Has anyone out there had any experience with Windows CE and SDK? Jon Turner Agris Corporation jturner@agris.com -----From: CraigTT@ccmail01.PE-Nelson.COM Jon, I personally haven't any experience but I was at the Windows SIG of the Software Forum last night and there was a short discussion about CE. There was a statement made by someone who has been using the SDK that it only works with VC++ 4.0 not 4.1 or 4.2. Tim Craig PE-Nelson ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: Integrating Windows CE development kit into Visual C++ 4.2 Author: mfc-l@netcom.com at SMTPLINK-PEN Date: 12/5/96 12:25 PM Received: by ccmail from lax.PE-Nelson.COM >From owner-mfc-l@majordomo.netcom.com X-Envelope-From: owner-mfc-l@majordomo.netcom.com Received: from majordomo.netcom.com (listless.netcom.com) by lax.PE-Nelson.COM (5.65c/IDA/PE-Nelson) id AA13696; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 12:24:22 -0800 Received: by majordomo.netcom.com (8.7.5/8.7.3/(NETCOM MLS v1.01)) id IAA00652; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 08:44:03 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <01BBE0FF.4463E3E0@jturner.agris.com> From: Jon Turner To: "'mfc-l@netcom.com'" Subject: Integrating Windows CE development kit into Visual C++ 4.2 Date: Tue, 3 Dec 1996 09:49:19 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Brad Wilson/Crucial Software -- crucial@pobox.com Sunday, December 08, 1996 > Let's hope the MFC team puts out something even beta in for this so we can > use MFC. MFC will never (and should never) support Windows CE. Go read the specifications on Windows CE to know why ... your apps have to be VERY VERY tight and trim; not to mention, some of the functionality exploited by MFC (namely, hooks) isn't supported. -- Brad Wilson Custom software development & solutions crucial@pobox.com Internet and intranet consulting services The Brads' Consulting Windows NT/Windows 95 software development http://www.thebrads.com Web site planning, development and maintenance Content (C) 1996 Brad Wilson; no reproduction without authorization
Mike Blaszczak -- mikeblas@nwlink.com Wednesday, December 11, 1996 [Mini-digest: 3 responses] [Moderator's plea: Can we end this discussion, please?] At 16:48 12/8/96 -0500, Brad Wilson wrote: >MFC will never (and should never) support Windows CE. Really? .B ekiM http://www.nwlink.com/~mikeblas/ I'm afraid I've become some sort of speed freak. These words are my own. I do not speak on behalf of Microsoft. -----From: "Robert H. Mowery III"> MFC will never (and should never) support Windows CE. Go read the > specifications on Windows CE to know why ... I disagree. I wouldn't say never. There are too many developers writing MFC based applications that will want to port them to the Windows CE. I would guess MS themselves will be doing such. There is no way I or anyone else will want to maintain two derivations of development. First, it is too costly and second it would be far too difficult to keep the applications in synch if one had to write the same app in both the SDK and MFC. >your apps have to be VERY VERY > tight and trim; not to mention, some of the functionality exploited by MFC > (namely, hooks) isn't supported. MFC apps can be written tightly. For some reason everyone thinks MFC bloats everything. Why is that? While MFC doesn't support hooks ( I am guessing you are refereing to Windows hooks like keyboard hooks, cbt hooks, etc.) there is no reason that a class cannot be written to that encapsulates the SDK calls. I don't find these valid enough reasons to think MFC would not be ported to the Windows CE. After all a Macintosh port was made of MFC :-) and these little CE devices will out do those Macs in the long term :-) Just my two cents. I would like to hear more view points though on this........ -Robert Mowery ---------- > From: Brad Wilson > To: mfc-l@netcom.com > Subject: Re: Integrating Windows CE development kit into Visual C++ 4.2 > Date: Sunday, December 08, 1996 4:48 PM > > > Let's hope the MFC team puts out something even beta in for this so we > can > > use MFC. > > MFC will never (and should never) support Windows CE. Go read the > specifications on Windows CE to know why ... your apps have to be VERY VERY > tight and trim; not to mention, some of the functionality exploited by MFC > (namely, hooks) isn't supported. > > -- > Brad Wilson Custom software development & solutions > crucial@pobox.com Internet and intranet consulting services > The Brads' Consulting Windows NT/Windows 95 software development > http://www.thebrads.com Web site planning, development and maintenance > Content (C) 1996 Brad Wilson; no reproduction without authorization > -----From: Ash Williams >> MFC will never (and should never) support Windows CE Noone suggested MFC itself - the 'MFC-team' could quite easily put out a _slim_ _cousin_ of MFC and not MFC itself, to wrap many of the Api's, but not go quite as crazy, eg leave out doc-views say. Or maybe something else, but you've got the idea I would hate to think all CE apps would consist of Api calls like the bad old days of windows sdk. In fact the first thing I and many other c++/object programmers would do would be to make my own (slim) class-wrappers, but I'd rather use some standard classes if possible. If not Microsoft then some other company such as Stingray. And hopefully any CE-MFC would be a much better design than schizo Win95-MFC! Ash
| Вернуться в корень Архива |